• ALERT!
    Are you signed up to our free weekly Alert email?
    Take a moment to check and stay on top of the
    tunnelling world's news and views
Amtrak capitalizes on ARC demise Mar 2011
Paula Wallis, TunnelTalk
Propelled by its future high speed rail plans, Amtrak seized the opportunity to revive a new rail tunnel between New Jersey and Manhattan three months after New Jersey canceled a similar project due to potential cost overruns.
Gateway alternative route through New Jersey and New York

Gateway alternative route through New Jersey and New York

The national railway picked up the derailed ARC (Access to the Regions Core) project and is retooling it to capitalize on President Obama's commitment to a high-speed rail system that connects 80% of the country's population.
Amtrak President Joseph Boardman, along with New Jersey Senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez, outlined the basic framework for the Gateway Project in a news conference in February (Fig 1). The rail connection follows generally the alignment of the ARC project that would have carried New Jersey Transit commuter trains in a new Hudson River tunnel crossing and into an expanded Penn Station in Manhattan (Fig 2).
Amtrak is proposing to spend $50 million to begin preliminary engineering and design on the parallel rail tunnels that would significantly increase commuter train capacity. The project would allow NJ Transit to add 13 more trains per peak hour into New York City and eight more Amtrak trains per hour, bringing the total number of trains to 33 and 20 respectively.
"When the ARC Tunnel was cancelled, it was clear to me that we couldn't just throw up our hands and wait years to find another solution," said Senator Lautenberg. "I immediately went to work looking for new ways to get cars off our roads and expand rail access from New Jersey neighborhoods to New York City office buildings. Amtrak answered the call and is spearheading a project that will help New Jersey commuters and also expand intercity and high-speed rail on the Northeast Corridor."
"We don't like to compare the two projects," said Cliff Cole, Amtrak's spokesperson, "however, ARC was designed to run New Jersey Transit trains.
ARC alignment through New Jersey and New York

ARC alignment through New Jersey and New York

Gateway expands capacity and maneuverability for Amtrak and New Jersey Transit trains, which we certainly consider a benefit and are hopeful the project will move forward to completion."
Amtrak projects that the entire Gateway Tunnel project could be completed in 2020 at an estimated cost of $13.5 billion. The investment would be the first step in Amtrak's $117.5 billion plan to upgrade the entire Northeast Corridor to accommodate train speeds of up to 220mph and bring travel times between Washington and Boston down to under 3.5 hours (Fig 3).
The new Amtrak tunnels would connect to the new Moynihan Station as well as to a new Penn Station South of the existing New York Penn station (Fig 4). The Moynihan Station connects the historic Farley Post Office Building with Penn Station, expanding train and passenger capacity at the busiest station in the nation. The long delayed Moynihan Station broke ground in October 2010 and includes new entrances to Penn Station through the Farley building as well as a wider and longer west end concourse, more escalators and other infrastructure work.
The Gateway project also includes a total replacement and expansion of the 100 year-old Portal Bridge over the Hackensack River between Kearny and Secaucus.
Proposed northeast high-speed rail corridor improvements

Proposed northeast high-speed rail corridor improvements

There would also be significant infrastructure improvements in New Jersey, including expanding track capacity from what is essentially a two-track railroad to an operationally superior four-track configuration between Newark and New York Penn Stations.
Unlike ARC that would have terminated in a new deep station under 34th Avenue and was incompatible with the existing rail network, Gateway Tunnel trains would run directly into Penn Station. A new Penn Station South would serve as a terminus for New Jersey Transit, freeing up space in the existing Penn Station for Amtrak trains running on to Boston.
The Gateway project would reduce the number of hourly ARC commuter trains from 25 to 13 and eliminate connections to the Bergen and Passaic lines, but the direct connection to Penn Station allows Amtrak and New Jersey Transit trains to share the link, eliminating a future third Hudson tunnel crossing planned by Amtrak.
"The Hudson tunnel crossing was in Amtrak's 2030 masterplan," said Cole. "This is an opportunity to move that goal forward to an estimated completion date of 2021."
At an estimated $13.5 billion, the Gateway project is about $5 billion more than the estimated $8.5 billion ARC program and at present no funding is available for it or the $50 million needed to start the preliminary engineering studies.
"We have included the $50 million in our 2011-2012 budget request and are waiting to see what allocation we receive," said Cole. "If the appropriation request comes through we estimate the preliminary engineering and design phase will take four years." Cole added that it was too early to say how much, if any, of the planning and design work completed for ARC could be included in the Gateway plans.
Proposed Penn Station expansion

Proposed Penn Station expansion

Amtrak may have a tough time selling the plan on Capitol Hill where a Republican lead Congress is committed to cutting federal spending. New competition has also arrived on the scene since the cancellation of ARC. New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg is endorsing a proposed extension of the City’s No 7 Line from its current terminus on Manhattan's West Side, under the Hudson River to the Lautenberg Station in Secaucus, New Jersey and a connection to New Jersey Transit trains. The extension, unlike the Gateway or ARC proposals, would give New Jersey commuters direct access to Grand Central Station and Queens.
Supporters say the No 7 Line extension would also double the number of trains between the two states during peak hours and at a fraction of the cost of other proposals. At an estimated $5.3 billion, the extension would not require costly condemnation proceedings or extensive tunneling under Manhattan’s pricey real estate.
Still, the Gateway Project includes the intercity high-speed rail component and has a major ally in the Obama administration, which pledged $53 billion in Federal funds last month to nationwide high-speed rail projects over the next six years. It might also gain the support of Republican Congressmen John Mica of Florida, the new House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman, who has been a vocal supporter of the Northeast High Speed Rail Corridor. He favors routes that would pay for themselves and in a 2009 statement argued for increased private investment saying: "With the right mix of public and private participation, the United States could leverage this federal investment to build high-speed rail corridors that are economically competitive and actually generate a profit."
Amtrak will now look for funding from private investors and well as local, regional and state governments including New Jersey, New York State, New York City, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and New York's Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA).
Table 1. Detailed comparison of the three different proposals
Gateway Project ARC Project Proposed No. 7 extension
Add peak trains to NYC per hour 13 24 0
Allow direct service to NYC for Bergen and Passaic Lines N0(but built to allow connection in the future) Yes No
Expand subway direct access in Manhattan beyond the lines available from current Penn Station Maybe (contemplates adding one more line : the 7) Yes (add direct access to seven more lines : N,Q,R,B,D,F & M) Yes(would add direct access to ten more lines : N,Q,R,B,B,D,F,M,4,5 & 6)
Expected completion date 2020 2018 ?
Trains controlled by New Jersey Agency Yes (in coordination with Amtrak) Yes No
Expands pedestrian capacity at Moynihan/Penn Station Complex Yes Yes No
Relieves congestion on NJ Transit lines throughout New Jersey Yes Yes No
References
ARC cancellation hits industry hard - TunnelTalk, Nov 2010
California calls for high-speed rail collaborators - TunnelTalk, Feb 2011

           

Add your comment

Thank you for taking the time to share your thoughts and comments. You share in the wider tunnelling community, so please keep your comments smart and civil. Don't attack other readers personally, and keep your language professional.
In case of an error submitting Feedback, copy and send the text to Feedback@TunnelTalk.com
Name :

Date :

Email :

Phone No :

   Security Image Refresh
Enter the security code :
No spaces, case-sensitive
 
 

TBM

Tunnel

Tunnelling

Boring

Conveyor

Cutterhead

Cut and cover

Tunnel Boring Machine

Double shield

Drill and blast

EPB

Earth Pressure Balance machine

reinforced fibre

Geotechnical engineering

EPBM

Headrace

Immersed tube

Jet-grouting

NATM

Over-excavation

One-pass lining

Pipe jacking

Road header

Rock bolt

Secondary lining

Underground

tunnel jobs

natm

tunnel excavations

tunnel boring

shaft sinking

tunnel mining

Diary Dates

Career Moves

Accolades

Procurement

Equipment Sales
Tunnel Directory
Tunnel Events
Tunnelling Events
TunnelCast
TunnelCast Videos
Tunnelling news
Tunnel Articles
World news
Used Tunnelling Equipments
TBM PLC
Tunnel News
Tunnel articles
Tunnelling articles
Tunnelling magazine
Tunnel Magazine